Using CANoe for Functional Safety Validation in Automotive ECU Development

Authors

  • Anand Wanjari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/jts.3088

Keywords:

CANoe, Functional Safety, ISO 26262, UDS, ECU Validation, CAPL, Automotive Diagnostics

Abstract

This paper explores the role of CANoe as a test and simulation environment to support functional safety validation in accordance with ISO 26262 standards. The study presents methodologies to simulate fault injection, monitor safety mechanisms, and validate diagnostic services (UDS) using CANoe's configurable nodes and CAPL scripting. A case study of powertrain ECU testing is included to demonstrate how CANoe supports safety goal validation, failure mode coverage, and ASIL decomposition requirements. The proposed approach improves traceability, reduces manual effort, and enhances early detection of safety violations. The findings indicate that utilizing CANoe not only streamlines the testing process but also significantly contributes to achieving compliance with functional safety standards in automotive development. Moreover, the integration of CANoe into the development lifecycle facilitates a structured approach to meet the safety requirements outlined in ISO 26262, ultimately enhancing overall vehicle safety. The implementation of such methodologies can lead to more robust safety systems, ultimately addressing the critical need for improved vehicle safety in the automotive industry. The findings underscore the potential of CANoe to revolutionize the testing landscape, ensuring that automotive ECUs meet stringent safety standards effectively and efficiently.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Anand Wanjari

Independent Researcher

References

Lanigan, P. E., Narasimhan, P., & Fuhrman, T. E. (2010). Experiences with a CANoe-based fault injection framework for AUTOSAR. Dependable Systems and Networks. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN.2010.5544419

Kafka, P. (2012). The automotive standard ISO 26262, the innovative driver for enhanced safety assessment & technology for motor cars. Procedia Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENG.2012.08.112

Pintard, L. (2015). From safety analysis to experimental validation by fault injection - Case of automotive embedded systems.

Dawson, J., & Garikapati, D. (2021). Extending ISO26262 to an Operationally Complex System. https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSCON48628.2021.9447146

Naqvi, S. Z. A. (2018). Checking Compliance with ISO 26262 using Conceptual Modeling as a Tool.

Nissimagoudar, P. C., Mane, V., H M, G., & Iyer, N. C. (2020). Hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) Simulation Technique for an Automotive Electronics Course. Procedia Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2020.05.153

Diagnostic Communication and Visual System based on Vehicle UDS Protocol. (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2206.12653

Gangadhar, P., McGrail, R., Pati, S., Antonsson, E., & Patel, R. (2024). Process Improvements for Determining Fault Tolerant Time Intervals. SAE Technical Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.4271/2024-01-2791

Website link - https://theevreport.com/volvo-recalls-electric-trucks-for-battery-fire-risk

Pimentel, J. R., & Kaniarz, J. (2004). A CAN-Based Application-Level Error Detection and Fault Containment Protocol. IFAC Proceedings Volumes. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)36106-2

Wiersma, N., & Pareja, R. (2017, September 1). Safety! = Security: On the Resilience of ASIL-D Certified Microcontrollers against Fault Injection Attacks. Workshop on Fault Diagnosis and Tolerance in Cryptography. https://doi.org/10.1109/FDTC.2017.15

Volvo Cars. Recall No. 19V645000: Brake Pedal Weld Failure. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) [Internet]. 2019 Sep 6 [cited 2025 Jul 17]. Available from: https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls

Pan Y, Zhang F, Wang C. Root cause analysis of fire incidents in lithium-ion battery packs. J Power Sources. 2021; 490:229509.

Bosch Engineering GmbH. Integrated validation of battery management systems using HIL simulation and fault injection. SAE Technical Paper. 2023;2023-01-0465.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-06

How to Cite

Wanjari, A. (2025). Using CANoe for Functional Safety Validation in Automotive ECU Development. Journal of Technology and Systems, 7(5), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.47941/jts.3088

Issue

Section

Articles