Physiochemical and Sensorial Properties of Burgers Produced from Nubian Goat Meat and Beef
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jfs.1098Keywords:
Goat meat, beef, sausage, physiochemical, sensoryAbstract
Purpose: This study was aimed to evaluate sausage processed from different levels of goat meat replacement beef meat.
Methodology: Beef top side cut and goat leg were purchased from local market and used according to A ( Beef 50 % ,goat meat 50 % ) , B( beef 25 % , goat meat 75 % ) , C ( goat meat 100 % ) and D ( Beef 100 % ) as control group, and to compare the goat meat sausages with the most common commercial sausages made with beef.
Findings: The chemically, crude protein percentage was significantly different (p<0.05) in sausage treatments where higher in beef sausage, ash, and fat were also different increased with beef meat among sausage treatments, on the other hand moisture content increased with goat meat. Ultimate pH and cooking loss % of sausage treatments were significantly different (p <0.05). Total viable bacterial counts of sausage treatments were determined. Sensory attributes, including color, flavor, juiciness, tenderness, and overall acceptability among the different types of sausages prepared were no significantly differences (p > 0.05)
Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: Goat meat mainly from animals out of quality brands with low commercial value can be valorized when processed, giving the opportunity to increase its consumption and acceptability. In this study goat meat incorporated to the sausage ingredients with beef fat to evaluated the quality and flavor of sausage replacing beef meat. Sudanese Nubian goat meat useful for use in meat processing products with good characteristics and more acceptable for the final products. More researches for use goat meat in other meat products.
Downloads
References
Agregán R., Barba F.J., Gavahian M., Franco D., Khaneghah A.M., Carballo J., Ferreira I.C.F., Barretto A.C.D.S., Lorenzo J.M. Fucus vesiculosus extracts as natural antioxidants for improvement of physicochemical properties and shelf life of pork patties formulated with oleogels. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019;99:4561–4570. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9694.
AOAC (1990). Official methods of analysis, (15th ed.). Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
Babiker, s.A. (1981). Accelerated processing of beef in relation to ambient temperature. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham, England.
Das A.K., Anjaneyulu A., Thomas R., Kondaiah N. Effect of Different Fats on The Quality of Goat Meat Patties Incorporated with Full-Fat Soy Paste. J. Muscle Foods. 2009;20:37–53.
Devendra, C. (1990). Goat production: an international perspective. Proceedings of the International Goat Production Symposium, 22–25 October, 1990. Florida A&M University Tallahassee.
Ding, W., Kou, L., Cao, B., & Wei, Y. (2010). Meat quality parameters of descendants by grading hybridization of boer goat Guanzhong dairy goat. Meat Science, 84, 323–328.
Garza Institute for Goat Research (pp. 5). Oklahoma: Langston University.
Gamaleldin M. Suliman , Abdullah N. Alowaimer, Elsayed O.S. Hussein, Hatem S. Ali, Sameh A. Abdelnour, Mohamed E. Abd El-Hack and Ayman A. Swelum. (2019) Chemical Composition and Quality Characteristics of Meat in Three One-Humped Camel (Camelus dromedarius) Breeds as A_ected by Muscle Type and Post-Mortem Storage Period journal animals v.9, 834.
Grau, F. and Hamm, R. (1953). Naturwiss. 40: 39 cited from: Trout, R.G. (1988). Techniques for measuring water holding capacity in muscle foods. A review of methodology. Meat Sci. 23: 235-252.
Guerra ªI.C.D., S. S. S. Félexª. B. R . L . M. Meirelesª. P. S. Dalmásª, R. T. Moreira ª , V. G. Honório ª , M. A .b, RF. Milani b, S. D. Benevides c, R. C. R. E Queiroga ª, M. S. Madruga ª ( 2011 ) Evaluation of goat mortadella prepared with different levels of fat and goat meat from discarded animals, Small Ruminant Research,Volume 98, Issues 1– 3, Pages 59–63.
Hadjipanayiotou, M., & Koumas, A. (1994). Carcass characteristics of equally mature Chios lambs and Damascus kids. Small Ruminants Research, 13, 71–77.
Hogg, B. W., Mercer, G. J. K., Kirton, A. H., & Duganzich, D. M. (1992). Carcass and meat quality attributes of commercial goats in New Zealand. Small Ruminants Research, 8, 243–256.
Johnson, D. D., Eastridge, J. S., Neubauer, D. R., & McGowan, C. H. (1995). Effect of sex class on nutrient content of meat from young goats. Journal of Animal Science, 73, 296–301.
Leite A., Rodrigues S.S.Q., Pereira E., Paulos K., Oliveira A.F., Lorenzo J.M., Teixeira A. Physicochemical properties, fatty acid profile and sensory characteristics of sheep and goat meat sausages manufactured with different pork fat levels. Meat Sci. 2015;105:114–120.
Mahgoub.O, Khan, A. J., Al-Maqbaly, R. S., Al-Sabahib, J. S., Annamalaia, K. Al-Sakry, N. M. (2002). Fatty acid composition of muscle and fat tissues of Omani Jebel Akhdar goats of different sexes and weights. Meat Science 61 (2002) 381–387.
Marinova, P., Banskalieva, V., Alexandrov, S., Tzvetkova, V., & Stanchev, H. (2001). Carcass composition and meat quality of kids fed sunflower oil supplemented diet. Small Ruminant Research, 42, 219–227.
Nagaraj, N.S.; Anilakumar, K.R.; Santhanam, K. Postmortem changes in myofibrillar proteins of goat skeletal muscles. J. Food Biochem. 2005, 29, 152–170.
Owen, J. E., Norman, G. A., Philbrooks, C. A., & Jones, N. S. D. (1978).
perinephric fats of various redmeat species. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und Technologie, 23, 433–440.
Rawaa Foud M., Adam, Y. S.I. Abdelrahim Abubakr, Wisal Babiker Zeinalabdeen Elbashir (2020). Evaluation of Smoked Meat Mortadella Products in Khartoum Markets. Journal of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences vol 21 p 39_48.
Raljic, J. P., Krajinovic, M., Masˇic, D. K., Cvetkovic, T., Dzinic, N., Popov, S., & Kunc, V. (1995). Chemical composition of kid meat of the domestic white goat. Acta Veterinaria, 45, 303–310.
Rhee. K. S, Cho1 S. H, Pradahn, A. M. (1999). Composition, storage stability and sensory properties of expanded extrudates from blends of corn starch and goat meat, lamb, mutton, spent fowl meat, or beef. Meat Science 52 (1999) 135-141.
Swanson, K.M.J., F.F. Busta, E.H. Peterson and M.G. Johnson, 1992. Colony count methods. In C. Vanderzant and D.F. Splittstoesser (Eds.), Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods (pp. 75-94). Washington, DC.: American Public Health Association.
Tech, T. H. (1992). Establishing a goat meat industry fact sheet. In E. Kika (Ed.), de la.
Teixeira A., Rodrigues S. Consumer perceptions towards healthier meat products. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021;38:147–154.
Teixeira A., Rodrigues S., Dias T., Estevinho L. Sheep and goat fermented meat products-health aspects. In: Zdolec N., editor. Fermented Meat Products: Health Aspects. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2017. pp. 78–94.
Teixeira A., Silva S., Guedes C., Rodrigues S. Sheep and Goat Meat Processed Products Quality: A Review. Foods. 2020;9:960.
Todaro, M., Corrao, A., Alicara, M. L., Schinelli, R., Giaccone, P., & Priolo, A. (2004). Effects of litter size and sex on meat quality traits of kid meat. Small Ruminant Research, 54, 191–196.
Todaro, M., Corrao, A., Barone, C. M. A., Schinelli, R., Occidente, M., & Giaccone, P.(2002) The influence of age at slaughter and litter size on some quality traits of kid meat. Small Ruminant Research, 44, 75–80.
Tshabalala, P. A., Strydom, P. E.,Webb, E. C., & De Kock, H. L. (2003).Meat quality designated South African indigenous goat and sheep breeds. Meat Science, 65, 63–570.
Webb, E. C., Casey, N. H., & Simela, L. (2005). Goat meat quality. Small Ruminant Research, 60, 153–166.
Xazela, N.M., Chimonyo, M., Muchenje, V., &Marume, U. (2012). Effect of sunflower cake supplementation on meat quality of indigenous goat genotypes of South Africa. Meat Science, 90, 204–208.
SAS. (2002). SAS User Guide, Release 6-03 Edition SAS. Institute Inc. Gray, NC, USA.
Steel, R.G. and Torrie, J.H. (1980). Principles and procedures of statistics, MC Grow Hill, New York, USA
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Yasir Salah Ibrahim Adam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
