Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and its Influence on Organizational Reputation

Authors

  • Julie Etikan University of Lagos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/jpr.1694
Abstract views: 101
PDF downloads: 56

Keywords:

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Organizational Reputation, Stakeholder Engagement, Transparent Communication, Leadership Commitment, Sustainability Initiatives

Abstract

Purpose: The main objective of the study was to examine Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and its influence on organizational reputation.

Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.

Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and its influence on organizational reputation. Preliminary empirical review revealed a strong positive correlation between CSR activities and organizational reputation across industries and geographical contexts. Companies prioritizing CSR initiatives like environmental sustainability and ethical practices are perceived more favorably by stakeholders, underscoring CSR's role in enhancing reputation and trust. Transparent communication of CSR efforts through various channels strengthens this reputation further. Additionally, the study identifies mediating and moderating factors such as CEO characteristics and industry norms, emphasizing the importance of strong leadership and tailored strategies. Ultimately, integrating CSR into strategic decision-making, transparent communication, and adaptation to stakeholder expectations are crucial for building a positive reputation that fosters long-term success.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Stakeholder theory, Institutional theory and the Resource Based View theory may be used to anchor future studies on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The study provided comprehensive recommendations based on its findings. Firstly, it suggests prioritizing CSR initiatives aligned with core values and business objectives to enhance reputation and build stakeholder trust. Secondly, transparent communication strategies should be adopted to convey CSR efforts effectively, fostering credibility and engagement. Furthermore, integrating CSR into overall business strategy and operations ensures its alignment with organizational culture and decision-making processes, maximizing its impact. Investing in stakeholder engagement enhances the effectiveness of CSR initiatives by involving diverse stakeholders in program design and evaluation. Additionally, monitoring and evaluating CSR impact through both quantitative and qualitative metrics is essential for accountability and continuous improvement. Lastly, leadership commitment and organizational culture are emphasized as crucial drivers of CSR, with senior executives playing a pivotal role in fostering an ethical and socially responsible environment that enhances organizational reputation and sustainability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alibaba Group. (2022). Alibaba Group Holding Limited: Company overview. Retrieved from https://www.alibabagroup.com/en/global/home

Barnett, M. L. (2008). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794-816. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684

Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 3-28.

Carroll, A. B. (2016). Carroll’s pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6

Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x

Edelman. (2022). Edelman Trust Barometer 2022: Global report. Retrieved from https://www.edelman.com/trust/2022-trust-barometer

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Garcia, R., Martinez, J. M., & Rodriguez, J. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and its impact on organizational reputation in the food and beverage industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 423-431.

Hassan, H. (2018). Corporate reputation and business strategy: Setting the research agenda for the next decade. Corporate Reputation Review, 21(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-017-0041-2

Johnson & Johnson. (2022). Caring for the world one person at a time. Retrieved from https://www.jnj.com/

Jones, A., & Smith, B. (2017). CSR activities and organizational reputation in the pharmaceutical industry: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(4), 787-803.

Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 206-221. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893928

Kim, H., & Park, S. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and organizational reputation in the retail sector: Evidence from South Korea. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54, 102029.

Li, X., Wu, Q., & Xu, H. (2018). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and organizational reputation in the financial services industry: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2285.

Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2011). Corporate citizenship as a marketing instrument: Concepts, evidence and research directions. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4), 457-484. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560110382030

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.

Microsoft. (2022). Microsoft CSR report. Retrieved from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility

Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2001.tb00102.x

Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00455.x

Patagonia. (2022). About us: Our mission. Retrieved from https://www.patagonia.com/

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2006/12/strategy-and-society

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2011/01/the-big-idea-creating-shared-value

Safaricom. (2022). About us: Our purpose. Retrieved from https://www.safaricom.co.ke/about

Starbucks. (2022). Starbucks global social impact report. Retrieved from https://www.starbucks.com/responsibility/impact

Statista. (2022). Global reputation index ranking of top companies 2021. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1224129/global-reputation-index-ranking-top-companies/

Tesla. (2022). Tesla's mission. Retrieved from https://www.tesla.com/about#mission_statement

Toyota. (2022). Toyota's corporate overview. Retrieved from https://www.toyota-global.com/company/profile/

Wang, Z., & Zhang, L. (2016). CEO characteristics and corporate social responsibility: Moderating effects on organizational reputation. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4251-4257.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.

Yang, Y., & Liu, H. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, corporate governance, and organizational reputation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(4), 823-839.

Zheng, X., Huang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2019). The impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational reputation in emerging markets: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 11(1), 144.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-18

How to Cite

Etikan, J. . (2024). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and its Influence on Organizational Reputation. Journal of Public Relations, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.47941/jpr.1694

Issue

Section

Articles