The Influence of Result-Based Monitoring on the Performance of Housing Projects in Nairobi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jepm.2852Keywords:
Result-Based Monitoring, Housing Projects, Project Performance, Construction ManagementAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of the article is to establish the influence of result-based monitoring on the performance of housing projects in Nairobi. Projects, including construction, aim to meet diverse stakeholder needs and are evaluated based on quality, time, and cost. The Project Management Institute (PMI) asserts that successful projects must be completed within budget, on schedule, and to the desired quality. Globally, many struggle to meet these benchmarks. Benchmarking evaluation approaches significantly influence housing project performance, yet their absence often leads to inefficiencies, cost overruns, delays, and quality issues. This study assessed the impact of benchmarking on housing projects in Nairobi, guided by Construction Management Theory.
Methodology: A descriptive research design was used, targeting 127 projects by 15 real estate developers between 2019–2024. Data were collected from 254 registered architects using structured questionnaires and analyzed using SPSS to generate descriptive and inferential statistics.
Findings: The findings underscore the widespread adoption and favorable perception of Result-Based Monitoring (RBM) as a project management approach in housing developments. The majority of respondents affirmed the use of RBM practices. The empirical evidence from the study aligns with international and regional findings on the positive relationship between RBM and housing project performance. While high levels of adoption and satisfaction prevail, the responses also highlight areas where targeted improvements in implementation fidelity, tool functionality, and feedback application could further enhance the impact of RBM systems.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: The study recommends the institutionalization of standardized RBM protocols across all housing projects. To address technical challenges, it is also recommended that organizations invest in modern monitoring tools and digital systems capable of real-time data tracking, analytics, and feedback generation. The unique contribution of the study is that Feedback loops should be institutionalized, with clear mechanisms for translating monitoring insights into actionable strategic decisions.
Downloads
References
Adeyemi, A., & Fagbenle, O. (2016). Benchmarking and Performance of Housing Projects in Nigeria. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2), 178-189.
Akinwale, A. & Olatunji, F. (2017). Influence of Stakeholder Involvement on the Performance of Housing Projects in Nigeria. African Journal of Construction Management, 23(2), 97-110.
Alaghbari, W., Kadir, M.R.A., Salim, A., & Ernawati (2017). The significant factors causing delay of building construction projects in Malaysia. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(2), 192- 206.
Al-Hazim, N., Salem, Z., & Ahmad, H. (2017). Delay and Cost Overrun in Infrastructure Projects in Jordan. Procedia Engineering, 183, 18-24.
Brown, P., & Harris, S. (2019). The Effects of Transformational and Transactional Management Styles on Housing Project Performance in the UK. European Journal of Project Management, 35(4), 275-289.
El Mansouri, H., & Benchekroun, M. (2018). Application of Result-Based Monitoring in Urban Housing Projects in Morocco. African Journal of Housing Studies, 14(2), 87-102.
Ferrari, G. & Rossi, M. (2019). Stakeholder Participation in Public Housing Projects in Italy. European Journal of Housing Policy, 19(3), 211-225.
Johnson, T. & Smith, R. (2018). The Impact of Stakeholder Involvement on Housing Project Performance in the United States. Journal of Project Management, 36(4), 345-359.
Khaled, A., & Ahmed, M. (2018). Impact of Participative Management Styles on Housing Project Performance in Egypt. African Journal of Construction Management, 22(3), 145-159.
Kim, S. & Lee, J. (2020). Effects of Stakeholder Involvement on Housing Project Performance in South Korea. Asian Journal of Construction Engineering, 28(1), 54-67.
Lefevre, M., & Dupont, A. (2020). Result-Based Monitoring in Public Housing Projects: A Case Study from France. European Journal of Construction Management, 26(3), 145-159.
Li, H., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Effects of Benchmarking on Housing Project Performance in China. Asian Journal of Construction Engineering, 24(3), 198-212.
Mensah, K., & Amponsah, R. (2021). Directive vs. Supportive Management Styles: Their Influence on Housing Projects in Ghana. Journal of African Construction Studies, 14(2), 132-148.
Moyo, T. & Msimang, M. (2021). Role of Stakeholder Engagement in Housing Project Performance in South Africa. Journal of African Development Studies, 22(3), 189-202.
Mwita, P., & Mwakalinga, J. (2020). Influence of Result-Based Monitoring on Affordable Housing Projects in Tanzania. Journal of African Development Studies, 18(4), 203-218.
Nzingu, J., & Karanja, P. (2018). Influence of Monitoring and Evaluation Practices on Success of Gated Residential Housing Projects in Nairobi County, Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 5(4), 1350 - 1365.
Obwatho, S. (2014). Academic research writing: The logical sequence. Nairobi, Kenya: Starbright Services.
Oladipo, R., Ikamari, L., Kiplang'at, J., & Barasa, L. (2015). General research methods. Nairobi: Oxford University Press.
Otieno, P. & Kamau, J. (2023). Influence of Stakeholder Participation on Public Housing Projects in Kenya. Kenya Journal of Project Management, 31(2), 45-60.
Pinha, D. C., & Ahluwalia, R. S. (2019). Flexible resource management and its effect on project cost and duration. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 15(1), 119-133.
PMI. (2018). Construction extension to the PMBOK® guide (3rd ed.). Newtown Square, Pa.:
Project Management Institute.
Senouci, A., Ismail, A., & Eldin, N. (2016). Time delay and cost overrun in Qatari public construction projects. Procedia engineering, 164, 368-375.
Shah, R. (2016). An Exploration of Causes for Delay and Cost Overruns in Construction Projects: Case Study of Australia, Malaysia & Ghana. Journal of Advanced College Of Engineering and Management, 2, 41. doi: 10.3126/jacem.v2i0.16097
Singh, R. (2017). Delays and cost overruns in infrastructure projects: extent, causes and remedies. Economic and Political Weekly, 43-54.
Wambui, M. & Mwangi, P. (2022). Impact of Stakeholder Involvement on Housing Project Performance in Nairobi. Kenya Journal of Housing Studies, 29(1), 72-88.
Yamamoto, H., & Suzuki, K. (2020). Influence of Kaizen and Lean Management on Housing Project Performance in Japan. Asian Journal of Project Management, 27(3), 198-213.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gabriel Wasonga Jabongo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
