Strategic Innovation and Performance of State-Owned Sugar Processing Firms in Nyanza Region, Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jbsm.2651Keywords:
Product Development, Market Innovation, Organizational Performance, State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), Strategic Innovation, Technological InnovationAbstract
Purpose: The general objective of this study was to examine the influence of strategic innovation on the performance of state-owned sugar processing companies in Nyanza, Kenya. Specifically, the study aimed to investigate the impact of the innovative processes, technological innovation and innovative product development and market innovation against the performance of state-owned sugar factories in the Nyanza region.
Methodology: The study used a descriptive approach. The target population was 300 respondents, and the researcher used the Yamane formula to arrive at the best sample size of 171 respondents. Data was collected using structured questionnaires. Collected data was cleaned, sorted and coded in ordinal scale using numerical numbers and entered in SPSS software version 29 and presented in form of tables and figures.
Findings: The study revealed that the current innovation strategies adopted by the manufacturing firms under study were impactful with 96% of the respondents indicating from moderately to very high impact. The regression analysis confirms that strategic innovation significantly enhances the performance of state-owned sugar firms. Technological innovation (β = 0.412, p = 0.001) had the strongest impact, followed by innovative processes (β = 0.381, p = 0.004), showing that firms that modernize operations and optimize workflows achieve better efficiency and cost reductions. Innovative product development (β = 0.298, p = 0.015) and market innovation (β = 0.275, p = 0.022) also contribute positively, emphasizing the need for continuous product differentiation and adaptive marketing strategies.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: Strategic innovation is critical for improving efficiency, competitiveness, and sustainability in state-owned sugar firms. Technological advancements and process optimization have the greatest impact, while product and market innovation enhance differentiation and customer engagement. Firms must integrate all four dimensions to maximize performance gains. Firms should invest in modern technology, automation, and data-driven decision-making, enhance process efficiency, diversify product offerings, and adopt digital marketing strategies. Government support, policy reforms, and industry partnerships are key to ensuring long-term sustainability and competitiveness.
Downloads
References
AlQershi, N. (2024). Strategic thinking, strategic planning, strategic innovation, and SME performance: The mediating role of human capital. Science and Education Innovations, 7(2), 78-85.
Blichfeldt, H., & Faullant, R. (2021). Performance effects of digital technology adoption and product & service innovation: A process-industry perspective. Technovation, 108, 102320.
Bogetoft, P., Kroman, L., & Smilgins, A. (2024). Innovation strategies and firm performance. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 49(1), 1-21.
Chege, S. M., Wang, D., & Suntu, S. L. (2020). Impact of information technology innovation on firm performance in Kenya. Information Technology for Development, 26(4), 645-671.
Chen, Q., & Wang, C. (2021). Effects of organizational innovation and technological innovation capabilities on firm performance: Evidence from firms in China's Pearl River Delta. Inside the Changing Business of Innovation, 15(3), 230-245.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
Edeh, J. N., Obodoechi, D. N., & Ramos-Hidalgo, E. (2020). Effects of innovation strategies on export performance: New empirical evidence from developing market firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, 120045.
Forcadell, F. J., & Guadamillas, F. (2002). A case study on the implementation of a knowledge management strategy oriented to innovation. Knowledge and Process Management, 9(3), 162-171.
Hanelt, A., Firk, S., & Hildebrandt, B. (2021). Digital M&A, digital innovation, and firm performance: An empirical investigation. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(2), 161-178.
Kabeyi, M. J. B., & Olanrewaju, O. A. (2022). Performance analysis and evaluation of ethanol potential of Nzoia Sugar Company Ltd. Energy Reports, 8, 100351.
Kamal, A., Rahman, T., & Hussain, Z. (2023). Process innovation and efficiency: Evidence from emerging economies. Journal of Business Innovation, 19(2), 55-72.
Kiss, A. N., Cortes, A. F., & Herrmann, P. (2022). CEO proactiveness, innovation, and firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(4), 101687.
Latifi, M. A., Nikou, S., & Bouwman, H. (2021). Business model innovation and firm performance: Exploring causal mechanisms in SMEs. Technovation, 103, 102195.
Li, F., Xu, X., Li, Z., Du, P., & Ye, J. (2021). Can low-carbon technological innovation truly improve enterprise performance? The case of Chinese manufacturing companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, 125162.
Moretti, F., & Biancardi, D. (2020). Inbound open innovation and firm performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(3), 175-187.
Nanjala, J. N., Immonje, M. M., & Okwiri, T. O. (2022). The economic challenges facing small-scale sugarcane farmers in Kenya. East African Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 6(2), 45-60.
Obadha, M. (2023). Historical development and competitiveness of Kenya’s sugar industry. Kenya Agricultural Policy Review, 12(1), 45-60.
Okenyoru, C. (2024). Management accounting practices and financial performance of public sugar manufacturing firms in Lake Region Economic Block, Kenya. University of Nairobi Repository.
Opazo-Basáez, M., & Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2022). Digital service innovation: A paradigm shift in technological innovation. Journal of Service Management, 33(1), 92-107.
Orwa, D. O., Akuku, C., & Kimutai, G. (2022). Effect of functional strategies on competitiveness of the sugar industry in Western Kenya. Journal of Business & Economics, 14(3), 220-235.
Radicic, D., & Petković, S. (2023). Impact of digitalization on technological innovations in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, 122602.
Rahman, M., & Rahim, N. (2021). Market innovation in manufacturing firms: Strategies for sustainability. Journal of Business Research, 136, 349-361.
Rahman, S., Karami, M., & Tajvidi, R. (2023). Market-driven innovation and firm profitability. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113269.
Shiamwama, S. M., Otieno, S., & Elijah, M. (2022). An assessment of capacity utilization and performance of public sugar manufacturing firms in Kenya. Academia.edu.
Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450-463.
Taques, F. H., López, M. G., Basso, L. F., & Areal, N. (2021). Indicators used to measure service innovation and manufacturing innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(2), 70-85.
Yamane, T. (1967). Sample Size Formular. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Geographic Information Science, (pp. 16-83).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Chacha Joseph Monanka, Dr. Dennis Juma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
