Management Awareness of Performance Contracting in State Corporations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jbsm.1306Keywords:
Performance Contracting, Management Awareness, and State CorporationsAbstract
Purpose: Drastic and fundamental changes are increasingly occurring in the environment in which organizations operate. An obvious manifestation of the responses towards this turbulent environment is the introduction of performance contracting as part of the broader public sector reforms aimed at improving efficiency and effectiveness in the management of the services. Managers form a major stakeholder group in an enterprise. However, their productivity and performance is dependent on their degree of motivation. This can be influenced by how they perceive and interpret various initiatives that may be introduced by the organization; a critical one in this regard being introduction of performance contracting. Performance contracting is a devolved management by outcome rather than management by processes. It provides a range of management instruments used within the public sector to define responsibilities and expectations between parties to achieve mutually agreed result. This research work sought to investigate the disconnect that may arise between management awareness of performance contracting in state corporations, based on their initial expectations from such a plan. The main objectives investigated during the study were to establish management's level of awareness of the performance contracts adopted by the state corporations.
Methodology: A sample of 160 respondents was used in the study. The data collected was presented using tables and analyzed using descriptive statistics i.e. frequencies, percentages, mean scores and standard deviations.
Findings: The major findings were: There is a very high level of awareness of performance contracting in the organizations and that the organization's capacity to achieve its objectives has greatly improved. To a moderate extent, the managers felt that there was mutual support and trust at all levels of the organization and empowerment of employees in their jobs. General conclusions drawn are that the organizations were very successful in implementing performance contracting, and that to a moderate extent, the organizations have developed a reasonable sense of direction.
Unique contributions to theory, practice and policy: Recommendations made were that, all employees need to be stakeholders in the future direction of the organization, even if it be in varying degrees. Their daily performance and activities should be measured along the specific milestones and core values identified by the contract, since what cannot be measured cannot be managed.
Downloads
References
Armstrong M (1999), A Hand Book of Human Resources Management Practice, Kogan Page Ltd, UK.
Bett. S.K (1995) Strategic Marketing of Dairy Products in Kenya. MBA Thesis University of Nairobi
Cole, G.A,(1997) Strategic Management: Theory and Practice, Ashford Color Press London.
Cooper D.R. and Schindler, P.S (2003). Business Research Methods, 8th Edition. Tata MC, Graw - Hill Edition.
Cope, G.R.(1989) High Involvement Strategic Planning, University of Washington Seattle.
Daily Nation, 22nd March (2005), Introduction of Performance Contracts in the Management of the Public Service, Pg.20
England, R. (2000), " Contracting and Performance Management in the Health Sector" A Guide for Low and Middle Income Countries.
GOK (2005a), Sensitization on Performance Contracts in the Public Sector, unpublished Training Manual
GOK (2005b), Information booklet on Performance Contracts in the Public Service, unpublished information booklet.
Hawkins D.I., Best R.J and Coney K.A (1998). Consumer Behaviour, Building Marketing Strategy, 7th Edition Irwin/mc Graw-Hill.
Hofer, C.W. and Schendel, D., (1978) Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts. St. Paul: West Publishing, London.
Huczynski A, Buchanan D (2001) Organizational Behaviour, 4th Ed, Pearson Education Ltd., England
Immelt J. (2003) In Search of Global Leaders - A perspective from Jeffrey Immelt, Harvard Business Review, Vol . 81 No. 8, PP. 42.
Kanj. G.K. (2002). Performance Measurement System. Total Quality Management, Vol. 13, Issue 5 PP 715.
Malathy J.K. (1997). "Performance Contracting: A strategy for Public Enterprises Reform in Sri Lanka?", Public Enterprise Reform and Regulatory Policy Series, IP5 Publication
Mann A.J. (1995), Public Enterprise Reform and the use of Performance Contracts, Puerto Rico.
Mapelu Z.O (2005). Contracts to Fire up State Corporations. Daily Nation 13th July, 2005 pg. 9
Mullins L.J. (1999) Management and Organizational Behaviour, 5th Edition, Financial Times Prentice Hall, Essex
Nellis, J.R (1995), Contract Plans and Public Enterprise Performance, World Bank
Ng'ang'a, J.N. (2004). Employee Perception of Strategy in a Public Organization. The case of KENGEN. Unpublished MBA Thesis, University of Nairobi.
NPR(1999), Balancing Measures, Best Practices in Performance Management, National Partnership for Reinventing Government, Department of Energy, U.S.A.
OECD (1999), Performance Contracts in Public Enterprises, Lessons from Case Studies on Performance Contracting, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris France.
PBMSIG (2001), "Performance Based Management Handbook: Establishing An Integrated Performance Measurement System", Performance Based Management Special Interest Group, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S.A.
Shirley M. (1998). Why Performance Contracts for State-Owned Enterprises Haven't Worked, World Bank Development Research Group Washington DC.
Shirley M. and XU, C.L (2000) Empirical Effects of Performance Contracts: Evidence from China, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol.17, No.1.
United Nations Guidelines, Guidelines for Performance Contracting, Published United Nations Manual.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Kiboi Anne Wanjiru, Jackson .K. Maalu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.